Vol. 337 No. 9 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/9/5697
Structural-parametric optimization of synthesis gas production complexes
Relevance. The development of remote and hard-to-access hydrocarbon fields requires the creation of autonomous mobile systems for processing associated petroleum gas into synthesis gas. Conventional design approaches oriented toward large-scale production do not account for strict weight and size constraints and the high energy-efficiency requirements typical of mobile units. Aim. To develop an algorithm for the structural and parametric optimization of components of small-scale synthesis gas production units based on non-catalytic partial oxidation, enabling a multi-criteria search for trade-off solutions between compactness and hydraulic losses. Methods. The study is based on the hierarchical decomposition of system components, thermodynamic modeling, and the solution of a multi-criteria optimization problem using the principal criterion method with successive approximations. The calculation of heat exchange equipment is performed using classical dimensionless correlation equations, with thermophysical properties refined on the basis of reference data incorporated into the software library. Results. The authors have developed and validated an algorithm that integrates thermodynamic and design calculations into a unified computational core. Using a double-pipe heat exchanger as an example, it is shown that the dependence of apparatus length on the inner tube diameter and the annular cross-sectional area is empirical. Pareto fronts were constructed for the criteria of apparatus length and hydraulic losses. Verification by comparison with simulations in Ansys Fluent showed a deviation in heat duty of no more than 5%. Conclusions. The proposed algorithm enables the determination of rational geometric parameters of heat exchange equipment at the early design stages, ensuring a justified compromise between weight and size characteristics and energy efficiency. The algorithm can serve as the computational core of a specialized computer-aided design system for mobile units.
For citation: Tseneva S.N., Kuzmin A.M. Structural-parametric optimization of synthesis gas production complexes. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2026, vol. 337, no. 9, pp. 7–16. http://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/9/5697
Keywords:
synthesis gas, non-catalytic partial oxidation of methane, small-scale complexes, Pareto optimization, structural-parametric optimization, mathematical modeling, algorithms in chemical engineering, methanol production
References:
1. Pusenkova N.N. Oil of the Arctic continental shelf of Russia: optimism, pessimism, realism. Contours of global transformations: politics, economics, law, 2019, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 86–108. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-86-108.
2. Hsu C.S., Robinson P.R. Natural Gas and Petroleum Products. In: Petroleum Science and Technology. Springer, Cham, 2024. pp. 193–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46645-8_8
3. Safdar Hossain S., Alsaffar M.A. Opportunities for integrated natural gas conversion technologies. Sustainable Utilization of Natural Gas for Low-Carbon Energy Production. Green Energy and Technology. Eds. B.V. Ayodele, S.I. Mustapa, S.A. Sarkodie. Singapore, Springer, 2024, pp. 91–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6282-8_10
4. Chinwuba I.K., Oguamah I.U., Uwaezuoke N., Udechukwu M., Ezenwoke C. Gas-to-liquid technology for sustainable energy development in Africa: a modular approach to stranded gas conversion. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2025, vol. 27, pp. 8083–8097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03328-0
5. Salahudeen N., Ahmed O.U., Rasheed A.A., Ali A.F., Abdullahi I., Mudi S.Y. Exergy analysis of direct method for conversion of natural gas to methanol. Discover Chemical Engineering, 2024, vol. 4, article number 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-024-00058-5
6. Narochnyi G.B., Saliev A.N., Zubkov I.N., Timokhina M.A., Bozhenko E.A., Chernysheva A.V., Kolobkov B.I., Savost’yanov A.P., Yakovenko R.E. Producing Synthetic High-Octane Gasoline from Associated Petroleum Gas. Catalysis in Industry, 2025, vol. 17, pp. 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070050424700399
7. Arutyunov V.S. On forecasts of global energy transition. ECO, 2022, no. 7 (577), pp. 51–66. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-7-51-66.
8. Bepari S., Mohammad N., Kuila D. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of CO₂-rich syngas using a CoRu-KIT-6 catalyst in a 3D-printed stainless steel (SS) microchannel microreactor. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2025, vol. 15, pp. 5700–5712.
9. Aliyu M., Alhassan M. Small-scale GTL technology: a review of recent advances and challenges. Fuel, 2024, vol. 358, 130215. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130215.
10. Chen J., Song W., Xu D. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of the catalytic partial oxidation of methane in microchannel reactors for synthesis gas production. Processes, 2018, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 83.
11. Beck A.G., Iyer S., Fine J., Chopra G. Paddy: an evolutionary optimization algorithm for chemical systems and spaces. Digital Discovery, 2025, vol. 4, pp. 1352–1371. DOI: 10.1039/D4DD00226A.
12. Bochkarev V.V. Optimization of chemical-technological processes. Moscow, Yurait Publ. House, 2025. 263 p. (In Russ.)
13. Yang Z., Pan T., Chang C., Zhang S., Zhang N., Smith R. Multi-objective-period heat exchanger network synthesis and decarbonization for industrial-scale crude oil distillation system. Energy, 2025, vol. 326, 136300. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136300.
14. Klemeš J.J., Varbanov P.S., Walmsley T.G., Jia X. New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, vol. 98, pp. 439–468.
15. Lopez-Arenas T., Sales-Cruz M., Segovia-Hernández J.G. A process simulator interface for multiobjective optimization of chemical processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2018, vol. 109, pp. 119–137.
16. Awani K., Hanak D., Kumar V., Nabavi S.A. Techno-economic assessment of decarbonization pathways for a gas to liquid facility: a review. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2024, vol. 90, 102994. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102994.
17. Wang Z., Nabavi S.R., Rangaiah G.P. Multi-criteria decision making in chemical and process engineering: methods, progress, and potential. Processes, 2024, vol. 12, no. 11, 2532. DOI: 10.3390/pr12112532.
18. Zapf F., Wallek T. Application of multi-objective optimization using commercial process simulators. Proceedings of the 2019 AIChE Annual Meeting, 2019.
19. Rao R.V., Taler J., Taler D., Lakshmi J. A unified optimization approach for heat transfer systems using the BxR and MO-BxR algorithms. Energies, 2026, vol. 19, no. 1, 34. DOI: 10.3390/en19010034.
20. Zhang Y., Wang L., Liu H. Multi-objective optimization of heat exchanger networks under uncertain conditions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, vol. 236, 121765. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121765.
21. Zagashvili Yu.V., Efremov V.N., Kuzmin A.M., Aniskevich Yu.V., Efremov V.V., Efremov R.N., Levikhin A.A., Levtrinskaya N.A. Method of producing hydrogen-containing gas for methanol production and a device for its implementation. Patent RF, no. 2632846 C1, 2017. (In Russ.)
22. Kuzmin A.M., Lishchiner I.I., Malova O.V., Tseneva S.N., Timofeev K.D., Moiseychikov A.A. Mobile complexes for small-scale production of methanol, motor gasoline and synthetic oil. Scientific journal of the Russian Gas Society, 2023, no. 3 (39), pp. 124–137. (In Russ.)
23. Kuzmin A.M., Tseneva S.N., Timofeev K.D., Moiseychikov A.A. Justification of the selection of heat exchangers in the synthesis gas preparation complex for small-scale methanol production. Electronic scientific journal Oil and Gas Business, 2022, no. 1, pp. 122–143. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17122/ogbus-2022-1-122-143.
