Vol. 337 No. 7 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/7/5453
Development of a mathematical model for vacuum gas oil hydrocracking based on experimental and numerical studies
Relevance. Modern refineries must increase conversion depth of heavy crude feedstocks while meeting stringent environmental standards for fuels. In this context, vacuum gas oil hydrocracking serves as a key technology for producing high-quality light petroleum products. Developing accurate mathematical models that account for complex hydrocarbon composition and catalytic process features has become essential for refinery digitalization. Aim. To develop a mathematical model of vacuum gas oil hydrocracking based on integrated experimental and numerical studies. Methods. Laboratory tests were performed in a catalytic reactor using a commercial Ni-W catalyst at temperatures from 400 to 420 °C. Product composition was analyzed by chromatographic techniques. Structure-oriented lumping approach is used combined with group contribution method to describe petroleum fractions. This approach enabled the creation of an extended component library with calculated physicochemical and thermodynamic properties. Components were grouped into 74 lumps based on structural features and carbon number. The model was formulated as a system of differential equations that includes material and energy balances. Results and conclusions. A detailed kinetic scheme was constructed using the lumped components and composed of 330 elementary hydrogen-involving reactions. Kinetic parameters were identified by solving an inverse problem using experimental data. The resulting model accurately reproduces product composition and can optimize industrial process conditions, including hydrogen-rich gas flow rate and temperature.
For citation: Grigorash M.S., Ivashkina E.N., Dementyev A.Yu., Chekmeneva D.V., Vaganov R.A., Chuzlov V.A., Boev A.S. Development of a mathematical model for vacuum gas oil hydrocracking based on experimental and numerical studies. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2026, vol. 337, no. 7, pp. 160-172. https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/7/5453
Keywords:
hydrocracking, catalyst, laboratory setup, mathematical model, material balance, kinetics
References:
1. Anchita H. Heavy oil processing. Reactors and process modeling. St Petersburg, TsOP “Profession” Publ., 2015. 592 p. (In Russ.)
2. Ivashkina E.N., Yuryev E.M., Krivtsova N.I., Belinskaya N.S. Oil and gas processing technology. Tomsk, Tomsk Polytechnic University Publ. House, 2021. 172 p. (In Russ.)
3. Boev A.S., Ivashkina E.N., Chuzlov V.A., Nazarova G.Yu. Scientific and engineering modeling of oil and gas refining processes. Business magazine Neftegaz.RU, 2024, № 6 (150), P. 16–26. (In Russ.)
4. Soto-Azuara L.A., Ramírez-López R., Del Monterrubio-Badillo M.C., Elizade I. Mathematical modeling of the hydrocracking kinetics of a heavy oil fraction using the discrete lumping approach: the effect of the variation of the lump number. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, 2022, Vol. 135, № 2, P. 655–667. DOI: 10.1007/s11144-022-02156-3.
5. Belinskaya N.S., Afanasyeva D.A., Bykova V.V., Kosten M.S. Study of regularities and development of a model of the vacuum gas oil hydrocracking process. Oil and Gas Technologies, 2021, № 4 (135), P. 10–15. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.32935/1815-2600-2021-135-4-10-15.
6. Laxminarasimhan C.S., Verma R.P., Ramachandran P.A. Continuous lumping model for simulation of hydrocracking. AIChE Journal, 1996, V. 42, № 9, P. 2645–2653. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690420925.
7. Kumar H., Froment G.F. Mechanistic kinetic modeling of the hydrocracking of complex feedstocks, such as vacuum gas oils. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, Vol. 46, № 18, P. 5881–5897. DOI: 10.1021/ie0704290.
8. Ancheyta J., Sánchez S., Rodríguez M. A. Kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil fractions: a review. Catalysis Today, 2005, Vol. 109, № 1–4, P. 76–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.015.
9. Pellegrini L., Bonomi S., Gamba S., Calemma V., Molinari D. The “all components hydrocracking model”. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, Vol. 62, № 18–20, P. 5013–5020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.076.
10. Quann R.J., Jaffe S.B. Structure-oriented lumping: describing the chemistry of complex hydrocarbon mixtures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1992, Vol. 31, № 11, P. 2483–2497. DOI: 10.1021/ie00011a013.
11. Chen J., Fang Z., Qiu T. Molecular reconstruction model based on structure oriented lumping and group contribution methods. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, Vol. 26, № 8, P. 1677–1683. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2017.09.013.
12. Marrero J., Gani R. Group-contribution based estimation of pure component properties. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2001, Vol. 183, P. 183–208. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00431-9.
13. Joback K.G., Reid R.C. Estimation of pure-component properties from group-contributions. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1987, Vol. 57, № 1–6, P. 233–243. DOI: 10.1080/00986448708960487.
14. Hukkerikar A.S., Sarup B., Kate A.T., Abildskov J., Sin G., Gani R. Group-contribution+ (GC+) based estimation of properties of pure components: improved property estimation and uncertainty analysis. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2012, Vol. 321, P. 25–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2012.02.010.
15. Wang T., Qin X., Ye L., Ma M., Hao B., Huang Z., Pu X., Han X., Liu P., Duan X., Wang Y., Liu J. Molecular level simulation of the conversion and distribution of sulfides in the fluid catalytic cracking and hydrotreating processes to improve the cleanliness of gasoline and diesel. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2024, Vol. 63, № 20, P. 8949–8961. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00392.
16. Hou L., Ye L., Qin X., Wang T., Ma M., Pu X., Han X., Liu P., Liu Z., Liu J. Predicting the physicochemical properties of molecules in petroleum based on structural increments. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, Vol. 62, № 19, P. 7744–7756. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04661.
17. Jiang Z., Cai G., Ji Y., Yang L., Chen W., Wang X., Li Q. Molecular-level catalytic reforming kinetic model based on modified structure-oriented lumping. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2024, Vol. 63, № 16, P. 6895–6905. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c04531.
18. Yu W., Ye L., Qin X., Murad A., Liu J., Ying Q., Xing B., Xie J., Hou L. Reaction behaviors of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon molecules in a diesel hydro-upgrading process based on the molecular-level reaction kinetic model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2022, Vol. 61, № 17, P. 5723–5733. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04570.
19. Tian L., Shen B., Liu J. Building and application of delayed coking structure-oriented lumping model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, Vol. 51, № 10, P. 3923–3931. DOI: 10.1021/ie2025272.
20. Ye L., Qin X., Murad A., Hou L., Liu J., Xie J., Yu W., Pu X., Han X., Zhao J., Sun H., Ling H. Coupling simulation of delayed coking and hydrotreating process at molecular level. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, Vol. 449, P. 137543. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137543.
21. Qin X., Ye L., Liu J., Xu Y., Murad A., Ying Q., Shen H., Wang X., Hou L., Pu X., Han X., Li J., Wang R., Liu N. A molecular-level coupling model of fluid catalytic cracking and hydrotreating processes to improve gasoline quality. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, Vol. 451, P. 138778. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138778.
22. Alvarez-Majmutov A., Chen J., Gieleciak R. Molecular-level modeling and simulation of vacuum gas oil hydrocracking. Energy & Fuels, 2016, Vol. 30, № 1, P. 138–148. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02084.
23. Qin X., Yu W., Ye L., Shen H., Liu J., Murad A., Xie J., Hou L., Pu X., Han X., Li J., Wang R., Liu N. Reaction laws of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heteroatomic compounds in hydrocracking process. Fuel, 2023, Vol. 332, P. 126242. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126242.
24. Vaganov R.A., Kuzmicheva M.V., Shmargunova M.S. Influence of technological parameters of the hydrotreating process of a mixture of straight-run diesel fraction and rapeseed oil on the yield and quality of the hydrogenate. South Siberian Scientific Bulletin, 2022, № 6 (46), P. 108–112. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25699/SSSB.2022.46.6.010.
25. Ivanova A.S., Korneeva E.V., Bukhtiyarova G.A., Nuzhdin A.L., Budneva A.A., Prosvirin I.P., Zaikovsky V.I., Noskov A.S. Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil in the presence of supported NiW catalysts. Kinetics and Catalysis, 2011, Vol. 52, № 3, P. 457–469. (In Russ.)
26. Golubev I.S., Dik P.P., Kazakov M.O., Klimov O.V., Noskov A.S. Influence of testing conditions of second-stage hydrocracking catalysts on the time to achieve their steady-state activity. Catalysis in Industry, 2023, Vol. 23, № 2, P. 73–82. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18412/1816-0387-2023-2-73-82.
27. Dutriez T., Courtiade M., Thiébaut D., Dulot H., Bertoncini F., Hennion M. C. Extended characterization of a vacuum gas oil by offline LC-high-temperature comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. Journal of Separation Science, 2010, Vol. 33, № 12, P. 1787–1796. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000102.
28. Ivashkina E.N., Nazarova G.Yu., Dementyev A.Yu., Chuzlov V.A., Sladkov D.Yu., Samoylov E.R., Grigorash M.S. Approaches to describing the composition and properties of vacuum gas oil for constructing mathematical models of deep oil refining processes. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Technology, 2024, Vol. 58, № 3, P. 305–315. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S0040357124030056.
29. Grigorash M.S., Ivashkina E.N., Chuzlov V.A. Molecular modeling of the composition of feedstock and products of vacuum gas oil hydrocracking. Business magazine Neftegaz.RU, 2024, № 10 (154), P. 23–33. (In Russ.)
30. Wang M., Yang H., Wang J., Gu T., Zhong M., Dai Z., Li J. Structure-oriented lumping method: an effective tool for molecular refining. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, Vol. 62, № 33, P. 12845–12854. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02203.
31. Ivashkina E.N., Koksharov A.G., Ivanchina E.D., Chuzlov V.A., Nazarova G.Yu., Chernyakova E.S., Dolganov I.M. Engineering models of oil refining processes: improving the efficiency of multi-stage gasoline production. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geor Assets Engineering, 2023, Vol. 334, № 4, P. 195–208. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2023/4/3793.
32. Nazarova G.Yu., Ivashkina E.N., Nafo B.D., Maltsev V.V., Shafan T.A. Forecasting the performance of the catalytic cracking process during co-processing of vacuum gas oil and low-margin oil refining streams. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2024, Vol. 335, № 4, P. 172–184. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2024/4/4489.
33. Nazarova G.Yu., Ivashkina E.N., Oreshina A.A., Maltsev V.V. Forecasting the content of sulfur compounds and total sulfur in catalytic cracking products during the processing of hydrotreated and non-hydrotreated petroleum feedstocks. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2024, Vol. 335, № 3, P. 204–215. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2024/3/4481.
34. Arkenova S.B., Ivashkina E.N., Gritsenko E.F. Forecasting the operation of an industrial unit for hydrotreating vacuum distillate using a mathematical model. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2025, Vol. 336, № 3, P. 183–192. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2025/3/4895.
35. Lee B.I., Kesler M.G. A generalized thermodynamic correlation based on three-parameter corresponding states. AIChE Journal, 1975, Vol. 21, № 3, P. 510–527. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690210313.
36. Stone C.P., Bisetti F. Comparison of ODE solver for chemical kinetics and reactive CFD applications. AIAA SciTech Forum: 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014. P. 0822. DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-0822.
