Vol. 337 No. 8 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/8/5340
Human health risk assessment from consumption of freshwater fish and crayfish containing mercury
Relevance. Mercury is one of the dangerous toxicants. And the food products are the main source of intake for the human body. Bioindication of mercury content in living organisms consumed by people allows identifying both the degree of their mercury contamination and the possible risks to the preservation of bioresources, and provides insights into the presence or absence of human health risks. Aim. To assess the safety of freshwater animals (fish, crayfish) consumed by residents of the territory affected by mining activities at the Novo-Ursk polymetallic deposit, and to identify possible human health risks. Methods. The total Hg content was determined by the AAS method (analyzer "RA-915M" with the pyrolytic attachment "RP-91S", Lumex, Russia) according to the method M 03-09-2013. The geochemical indices: provisional tolerable daily intake, maximum permissible limit (CRlim), maximum permissible meals per month, target hazard quotient, were used to assess the risks of the fish and crayfish consumption impact on human health. Results. Mercury concentrations in the fish exceed the maximum permissible concentration only in predatory ones, sampled in 5 km from the mouth of the drainage stream into the Ur River. The Hg content in the crayfish, living in the flooded quarry of Ursk mine, is higher than the maximum permissible concentration. For these sampling sites and variety fauna, the provisional tolerable daily intake values close to its reference were also recorded, as well as a smaller number of safe consumption portions per month and excess of target hazard quotient (there is a risk of non-carcinogenic diseases). For the remaining sampling sites carried out in the ore conditions of the Novo-Ursk deposit, the small number of safe consumption portions per month recorded in accordance with the reference values maximum permissible concentration, provisional tolerable daily intake and target hazard quotient indicate the need to prohibit the consumption of fish because of its low safety. Thus, it is not recommended to eat fish caught from water bodies that are affected by the Novo-Ursk deposit. Mercury concentration in fish of only the area located above of dispersion halo of the Novo-Ursk deposit is standard for safe consumption. The maximum permissible concentration and target hazard quotient (long-term consumption) for fish and crayfish are more corresponding to the possibility of safe consumption of products, compared to the provisional tolerable daily intake.
For citation: Gustaytis M.A., Myagkaya I.N. Human health risk assessment from consumption of freshwater fish and crayfish containing mercury. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2026, vol. 337, no. 8, pp. 244–254. http://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/8/5340
Keywords:
mining, mercury, fish, human health risk assessment, geochemical indices
References:
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidance for identifying population at risk from mercury exposure. 2008. Available at: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/chemical-safety/mercuryexposure.pdf?sfvrsn=e827b153_1&download=true (accessed 20 August 2025).
2. Diyabalanage S., Manthrirathne M.A.N.C., Lakmali M., Jayasinghe R.M.N.P.K., Werahera M., Chandrajith R. Exposure to mercury and toxic trace elements in waste gold extraction in Sri Lanka: a study on an under-recognised occupational health hazard. Environmental Research, 2025, Art. 122597.
3. Shinetova L.E., Bekeeva S.A. Modern concepts of the influence of various forms of mercury on the body. Bulletin of the Kazakh Medical University, 2017, no. 1, рр. 370–375. (In Russ.)
4. Bakir F., Damluji S.F., Amin Zaki I. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq: an interuniversity report. Science, 1973, vol. 181, pp. 230–241.
5. Eto K. Minamata disease. Neuropathology, 2000, vol. 20 (Suppl), pp. S14–S19.
6. Mielcarek K., Nowakowski P., Puscion-Jakubik A., Gromkowska-Kępka K.J., Soroczynska J., Markiewicz-Zukowska R., Naliwajko S.K., Grabia M., Bielecka J., Zmudzinska A., Moskwa J., Karpińska E., Socha K. Arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury content and health risk assessment of consuming freshwater fish with elements of chemometric analysis. Food Chemistry, 2022, vol. 379, Art. 132167.
7. Albuquerque F., Herrero-Latorre C., Miranda M., Barreto Júnior R.A., Oliveira F., Sucupira M., Ortolani E.L., Minervino A., Lopez-Alonso M. Fish tissues for biomonitoring toxic and essential trace elements in the Lower Amazon. Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987), 2021, vol. 283, Art. 117024.
8. Franco-Uría A., López-Mateo C., Roca E., Fernández-Marcos M.L. Source identification of heavy metals in pastureland by multivariate analysis in NW Spain. J. Hazardous Materials, 2009, vol. 165, pp. 1008–1015.
9. Machado K.S., Al Ferreira P.A., Rizzi J., Figueira R., Froehner S. Spatial and temporal variation of heavy metals contamination in recent sediments from Barigui River Basin, South Brazil. Environment Pollution and Climate Change, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 108.
10. Nemova N.N. Biochemical effects of mercury accumulation in fish. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005. 164 p. (In Russ.)
11. Nemova N.N., Lysenko L.A., Meshcheryakova O.V., Komov V.T. Mercury in fish: biochemical indication. Biosphere, 2014, no. 6 (2), pp. 176–186. (In Russ.)
12. Ain S.N.U., Abbasi A.M., Ajab H., Khan S., Yaqub A. Assessment of arsenic in Mangifera Indica (Mango) contaminated by artificial ripening agent: target hazard quotient (THQ), health risk index (HRI) and estimated daily intake (EDI). Food Chemistry Advances, 2023, vol. 3, Art. 100468.
13. Parang H., Esmaeilbeigi M. Total mercury concentration in the muscle of four mostly consumed fish and associated human health risks for fishermen and non-fishermen families in the Anzali Wetland, Southern Caspian Sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2022, vol. 52, Art. 102270.
14. Gustaitis M.A., Lazareva E.V., Bogush A.A., Shuvaeva O.V., Shcherbakova I.N., Polyakova E.V., Badmaeva Zh.O., Anoshin G.N. Distribution of chemical forms of mercury in sulfide tailings. Reports of the Academy of Sciences, 2010, vol. 432, no. 5, pp. 655–659. (In Russ.)
15. Gustaytis M.A., Myagkaya I.N., Chumbaev A.S. Hg in snow cover and snowmelt waters in high-sulfide tailing regions (Ursk tailing dumpsite, Kemerovo region, Russia). Chemosphere, 2018, vol. 202, pp. 446–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.076
16. Myagkaya I.N., Saryg-Ool B.O.Y., Kirichenko I.S., Gustaytis M.A., Lazareva E.V. Environmental and human health risk assessment of soils in areas of ore mineralization and past gold-mining activity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, vol. 31, pp. 47923–47945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34242-5
17. Myagkaya I.N., Gustaytis M.A., Saryg-ool B.Y., Lazareva E.V. Mercury partitioning and behavior in streams and source areas affected by the Novo-Ursk gold sulfide tailings (West Siberia, Russia). Mine Water and the Environment, 2022, vol. 41 (2), pp. 437–457.
18. Popov P.A., Androsov N.V., Popov V.A. Metal content in fish of the Tom River mouth (Upper Ob). Russian Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, Iss. 2, no. 14, pp. 31–34. (In Russ.)
19. Ng J.C. JECFA, Evaluation of Certain Contaminants in Food. Seventysecond Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Rome, February 16–25, 2010. WHO Technical Report Series 959, JECFA/72/SC.
20. Barone G., Storelli A., Meleleo D., Dambrosio A., Garofalo R., Busco A., Storelli M.M. Levels of mercury, methylmercury and selenium in fish: insights into children food safety. Toxics, 2021, vol. 9 (2), pp. 39.
21. Antoine J.M.R., Hoo Fung L.A., Grant C.N. Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in Jamaica. Toxicol. Rep., 2017, vol. 4, pp. 181–187.
22. US EPA RSL. U.S. environmental protection agency. Regional screening levels (RSLs) – Generic tables (May 2021). Available at: https://www.epa.gov/risk/r egional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables-may-2016 (accessed 20 August 2025).
23. Ahmadi H., Rezaei S. Consumption rate of fish among Iranian families; an annual study. Iran Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 2020, vol. 12 (2), pp. 278–279
24. Ciesielski T., Pastukhov M.V., Szefer P., Jenssen B.M. Bioaccumulation of mercury in the pelagic food chain of the Lake Baikal. Chemosphere, 2010, vol. 78 (11), pp. 1378–1384.
25. Junaidi M., Krisnayanti B.D., Anderson C. Risk of mercury exposure from fish consumption at artisanal small-scale gold mining areas in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Journal of Health and Pollution, 2019, vol. 9 (21), Art. 190302.
26. Mallongi A., Parkpian P., Pataranawat P., Chinwetkitvanich S. Mercury distribution and its potential environmental and health risks in aquatic habitat at artisanal buladu gold mine in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2015, vol. 14 (12), pp. 1010.
27. Asare-Donkor N.K., Adimado A.A. Influence of mining related activities on levels of mercury in water, sediment and fish from the Ankobra and Tano River basins in South Western Ghana. Environmental Systems Research, 2016, vol. 5, pp. 1–11.
28. WHO. Mercury–environmental aspects. Vol. 86. Environmental Health Criteria. Geneva, 1989.
29. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); scientific opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA Journal, 2012, vol. 10 (12):2985, pp. 241.
30. Gorbunov A.V., Lyapunov S.M., Okina O.I., Sheshukov V.S. Bioaccumulation of mercury in tissues of freshwater fish. Human ecology, 2018, no. 11, pp. 26–31. (In Russ.)
31. Higueras P., Oyarzun R., Lillo J., Sánchez-Hernández J.C., Molina J.A., Esbrí J.M., Lorenzo S. The Almadén district (Spain): anatomy of one of the world's largest Hg-contaminated sites. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, vol. 356, pp. 112–124.
32. Castilhos Z.C., Rodrigues-Filho S., Rodrigues A.P.C., Villas-Bôas R.C., Siegel S., Veiga M.M., Beinhoff C. Mercury contamination in fish from gold mining areas in Indonesia and human health risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, vol. 368 (1), pp. 320–325.
33. Majlesi M., Pashangeh S., Saleh S.O., Berizi E. Human health risks from heavy metals human health risks from heavy metals in fish of a fresh water river in Iran. Int. J. Nutr. Sci. Sept. 2018, Vol. 3, P. 157–163.
34. Okati N., Esmaili-sari A. Hair mercury and risk assessment for consumption of contaminated seafood in residents from the coast of the Persian Gulf, Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, vol. 25 (1), pp. 639–657.
35. Olivero-Verbel J., Carranza-Lopez L., Caballero-Gallardo K., Ripoll-Arboleda A., Muñoz-Sosa D. Human exposure and risk assessment associated with mercury pollution in the Caqueta River, Colombian Amazon. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, vol. 23, pp. 20761–20771.
