Vol. 337 No. 2 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/2/5293
Possibility of using biomass as a microwave absorber for intensifying microwave pyrolysis of coal and polymer waste
Relevance. Desire to reduce energy sector negative impact on the environment by replacing fossil fuels with renewable and CO2-neutral biomass resources. Aim. To study the possibility of using biomass as a microwave absorber to intensify microwave pyrolysis of energy-intensive raw materials. Methods. Certified SS methods for determining the thermal characteristics and elemental composition of the organic and mineral parts of organic raw materials, the "transmission–reflection" method for measuring the imaginary (ε'') and real (ε') components of the complex permittivity, physical experiment, gas analysis. Results. It is shown that some biomass samples (wheat husk, sunflower husk, manure and cedar nut shells) effectively interact with microwave radiation, which leads to their short processing initiation times (from 72 to 94 s). This is ensured by high values of the dielectric loss tangent (tg(α)>0.130), due to the composition of their organic part of the raw material, the degree of mineralization and its type, and the textural characteristics of the surface. These types of biomass can be considered as intensifying additives in microwave processing of materials with low absorption efficiency. For example, adding biomass to coal in amount of 10 to 20 wt % made it possible to reduce the microwave processing initiation time by 1.9–2.1 times, while the total process duration was reduced by 1.6–1.8 times. This contributed to a reduction in energy costs for processing by 3–21%. The greatest efficiency was achieved with the addition of 20% pine nut shells, while cattle manure demonstrated significantly lower efficiency. Joint microwave processing of biomass and polymer waste is possible, but this requires searching for optimal compositions of mixed compositions. It was shown that the presence of polymer waste in a mixture with biomass during melting prevents the occurrence of discharges between biomass particles in the microwave field. This limits the proportion of its content in the mixture. The use of biomass as a microwave absorber for intensifying the microwave pyrolysis of coal and polymer waste opens up new opportunities for the development of technologies for the thermal processing of organic waste under microwave heating conditions.
Keywords:
biomass, microwave pyrolysis, organic microwave absorber, characteristic process times, processing of mixed compositions, coal, polymer waste
References:
1. Filonchyk M., Peterson M.P., Zhang L., Hurynovich V., He Y. Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: examining the influence of CO2, CH4, and N2O. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, vol. 935, pp. 173359. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173359.
2. Bhatti U.A., Bhatti M.A., Tang H., Syam M.S., Awwad E.M., Sharaf M., Ghadi Y.Y. Global production patterns: understanding the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions, agriculture greening and climate variability. Environmental Research, 2024, vol. 245, pp. 118049. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.118049.
3. Ge M., Friedrich J., Vigna L. Where do emissions come from? 4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector. World resources institute, 2024. Available at: https://www.wri.org/insights/4-charts-explain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors (accessed 22 August 2025).
4. Carbon dioxide emissions from electricity. World nuclear association, 2024. Available at: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-electricity (accessed 22 August 2025).
5. Chen S., Zhang C., Lu X. Energy conversion from Fossil fuel to renewable energy. Handbook of Air Quality and Climate Change. Eds. A. Hajime, T. Hiroshi. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. pp. 1–44.
6. Demirbas A. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in energy and combustion science, 2005, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 171–192. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2005.02.002.
7. Qian X., Xue J., Yang Y., Lee S.W. Thermal properties and combustion-related problems prediction of agricultural crop residues. Energies, 2021, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 4619. DOI: 10.3390/en14154619.
8. Astafiev A.V., Ibraeva K.T., Dimitryuk I.D., Arbuzova E.A. Energy potential of using plant and animal biomass in relation to its thermal processing. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Аssets Engineering, 2024, vol. 335, no. 7, pp. 43–57. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2024/7/4605.
9. ITS 9-2020. Information and technical reference book on the best available technologies for the disposal and disposal of waste by thermal methods. Moscow, Bureau NDT Publ., 2021. 162 p. (In Russ.)
10. Ponomarev K., Pervushina A., Korotaeva K., Yurtaev A., Petukhov A., Tabakaev R., Shanenkov I. Influence of biochar amendment obtained from organic wastes typical for Western Siberia on morphometric characteristics of plants and soil properties. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2024, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 28849–28860. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-03927-1.
11. Laila U., Nazir A., Bareen F. Unleashing the potential of biochar composite as organic nutrient source: implications as soil ameliorant, seed yield, and physiological attributes of helianthus annuus L. Scientifica, 2024, vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 9550396. DOI: 10.1155/sci5/9550396.
12. Sarker T.R., Ethen D.Z., Nanda S. Decarbonization of metallurgy and steelmaking industries using biochar: a review. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2024, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. e202400217. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202400217.
13. Li J., Gan M., Ji Z., Fan X., Huang K., Wu Y., Sun Z. A novel method for preparing high-quality biochar from straw via coupled water quenching and pyrolysis for steel metallurgy. Energy, 2025, vol. 325, pp. 136090. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136090.
14. Tabakaev R., Ibraeva K., Astafev A., Dubinin Yu., Altynbaeva D., Larionov K., Yankovsky S., Yazykov N. Pine nut shells of Siberian cedar as a resource for the high-strength smokeless fuel. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2024, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 6737–6747. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02820-7.
15. Ke L., Zhou N., Wu Q., Zeng Y., Tian X., Zhang J., Fan L., Ruan R., Wang Y. Microwave catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: a review focusing on absorbents and catalysts. NPJ Materials Sustainability, 2024, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 24. DOI: 10.1038/s44296-024-00027-7.
16. Suresh A., Alagusundaram A., Kumar P.S., Vo D.-V.N., Christopher F.C., Balaji B., Viswanathan V., Sankar S. Microwave pyrolysis of coal, biomass and plastic waste: a review. Environ Chem Lett, 2021, vol. 19, pp. 3609–3629. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01245-4.
17. Monsef-Mirzai P., Ravindran M., McWhinnie W.R., Burchil P. The use of microwave heating for the pyrolysis of coal via inorganic receptors of microwave energy. Fuel, 1992, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 716–717. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(92)90180-V.
18. Zhang Y., Chen G., Wang L., Tuo K., Liu S. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of low-rank coal with K2CO3, CaCl2, and FeSO4 catalysts. ACS Omega, 2020, vol. 5, no. 28, pp. 17232–17241. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01400.
19. Ruslan R., Sardi B., Khairuddin K., Sumarni N.K., Tiro W., Magfira Z.P., Ainun N., Mahfud M. Microwave pyrolysis of low-rank coal: Enhancing liquid fuel yield and quality using Fe–TiO2 and Fe–HZSM-5 catalysts. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2025, vol. 119, pp. 101942. DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2024.101942.
20. Mao S., Shu R., Guo F., Bai J., Xu L., Dong K., Wei H., Qian L. Fuel gas production from microwave-induced biomass pyrolysis using char-supported metal composites as both catalysts and microwave absorbers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, vol. 47, no. 60, pp. 25309–25321. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene. 2022.05.260.
21. Reguera E., Díaz-Aguila C., Yee-Madeira H. On the changes and reactions in metal oxides under microwave irradiation. Journal of materials science, 2005, vol. 40, no. 19, pp. 5331–5334. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-4400-7.
22. Tabakaev R., Kalinich I., Tsimmerman A., Gajdabrus M., Mostovshchikov A., Shanenkov I. Intensification of microwave pyrolysis of hard coal by adding microwave absorbers based on iron and copper. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2025, pp. 107225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107225.
23. Monsef-Mirzai P., Ravindran M., McWhinnie W.R., Burchill P. Rapid microwave pyrolysis of coal: Methodology and examination of the residual and volatile phases. Fuel, 1995, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 20–27. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(94)P4325-V.
24. Bartoli M., Rosi L., Giovannelli A., Frediani P., Frediani M. Characterization of bio-oil and bio-char produced by low-temperature microwave-assisted pyrolysis of olive pruning residue using various absorbers. Waste Management & Research, 2020, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 213–225. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X19865342.
25. Tabakaev R., Kalinich I., Mostovshchikov A., Dimitryuk I., Asilbekov A., Ibraeva K., Gaidabrus M., Shanenkov I., Rudmin M., Yazykov N., Preis S. Microwave pyrolysis of cattle manure: initiation mechanism and product characteristics. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2024, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 26193–26204. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04686-9.
26. Tabakaev R., Kalinich I., Dimitryuk I., Asilbekov A., Astafev A., Ibraeva K., Shanenkov I., Mostovshchikov A., Chumerin P. Experimental study of microwave processing of pine nut shells into a high-calorie gas: Main results and physicochemical features. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2023, vol. 176, pp. 106264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106264.
27. Astafev A.V. Justification of the conditions for the implementation of autothermal pyrolysis of organic biomass in relation to heat technology equipment. Cand. Diss. Tomsk, 2021. 179 p. (In Russ.)
28. Agroexport. Beet pulp. Foreign trade overview. Federal Center for Development of Agricultural Exports of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation, 2024. 34 p. Available at: https://aemcx.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/obzor-ved_zhom-sveklovichnyj.pdf (accessed 16 October 2025).
29. Kharkov V.V., Tuntsev D.V., Kuznetsov M.G. Thermochemical processing of sunflower husks. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 2018, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 130–134. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/article_5c3de39d111083.70940804.
30. Sergienko V.I., Zemnukhova L.A., Egorov A.G., Shkorina E.D., Vasilyuk N.S. Renewable sources of chemical raw materials: complex processing of rice and buckwheat production waste. Russian Chemical Journal, 2004, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 116–124.
31. Offan K.B., Petrov V.S., Efremov A.A. Patterns of pyrolysis of pine nut shells with the formation of charcoal in the temperature range of 200–500 °С. The Chemistry of Plant Raw Materials Academic Journal, 1999, no. 2, pp. 61–64.
32. Tabakaev R., Ibraeva K., Yazykov N., Shanenkov I., Dubinin Y., Zavorin A. The study of highly mineralized peat sedimentation products in terms of their use as an energy source. Fuel, 2020, vol. 271, pp. 117593. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117593.
33. Chalapat K., Sarvala K., Li J., Paraoanu G.S. Wideband reference-plane invariant method for measuring electromagnetic parameters of materials. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2009, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 2257–2267. DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2027160.
34. Tabakaev R.B., Dimitryuk I.D., Kalinich I.K., Astafiev A.V., Gil A.V., Ibraeva K.T., Chumerin P.Yu. Experimental research of microwave pyrolysis of solid organic fuels. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Аssets Engineering, 2022, vol. 333, no. 12, pp. 190–199. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2022/12/3789.
35. Poddar S. Energy and Environmental Analysis (EEA) of a 100 tpd waste jute pyrolysis plant: Parametric Sensitivity of Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROEI) and CO2 Avoidance (ACO2). DJ Journal of Engineering Chemistry and Fuel, 2019, vol. 4 (1), pp. 40–53. DOI: 10.18831/djchem.org/2019011004.
36. Tabakaev R., Kalinich I., Chekmeneva D., Mostovshchikov A., Shanenkov I. Influence of liquid products formed at microwave pyrolysis of solid organic raw materials on process duration and energy consumption. Energy Conversion and Management, 2025, vol. 343, pp. 120197. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120197.
37. Shanenkov I.I., Tabakaev R.B., Mostovshchikov A.V., Kalinich I. Method for microwave processing of solid organic material into fuel gas. Patent RF, no. 2825350, 2024. (In Russ.)
38. Krupka J., Kamiński P., Kozłowski R., Surma B., Dierlamm A., Kwestarz M. Dielectric properties of semi-insulating silicon at microwave frequencies. Applied physics letters, 2015, vol. 107, no. 8. DOI: 10.1063/1.4929503.
39. Prins M.J., Ptasinski K.J., Janssen F.J.J.G. From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency. Energy, 2007, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1248–1259. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.017.
40. Mushtaq F., Mat R., Ani F.N. A review on microwave assisted pyrolysis of coal and biomass for fuel production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 555–574. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.073.
41. Salema A.A., Ani F.N., Mouris J., Hutcheon R. Microwave dielectric properties of Malaysian palm oil and agricultural industrial biomass and biochar during pyrolysis process. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, vol. 166, pp. 164–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.06.006.
42. Khorshidi Z., Ho M.T., Wiley D.E. The impact of biomass quality and quantity on the performance and economics of co-firing plants with and without CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, vol. 21, pp. 191–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.011.
43. Keller V., Lyseng B., English J., Niet T., Palmer-Wilson K., Moazzen I., Robertson B., Wild P., Rowe A. Coal-to-biomass retrofit in Alberta – value of forest residue bioenergy in the electricity system. Renewable energy, 2018, vol. 125, pp. 373–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.128.
44. Ryabov G.A. Cofiring of coal and fossil fuels is a way to decarbonization of heat and electricity generation (review). Thermal Engineering, 2022, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 405–417. DOI: 10.1134/S0040601522060052.
