Vol. 337 No. 2 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/2/5083
Profile of a near-surface storage facility for solid radioactive wastes from uranium production
Relevance. Near-surface storage facilities for solid radioactive wastes from uranium industry enterprises pose a potential threat to the environment. Therefore, solving the problem of conditioning sludges placed in these storages is an important ecological task. At the same time, radioactive wastes are a promising technogenic source of uranium, so the technology for sludges processing should include the possibility of uranium extraction. First, this task requires a detailed study of the wastes composition and forms of uranium state in sludges. Aim. To determine the phase and chemical composition of solid radioactive wastes of the near-surface storage facility of Chepetsky Mechanical Plant SC, to establish the storage facility profile, uranium concentration zones and forms of its state in the wastes. Methods. X-ray diffraction phase and X-ray fluorescence analysis, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis. Results and conclusions. The near-surface storage facility consists of three sites. The thickness of the upper screening soil layer is 3–3.5 m, this layer more than 59 wt % consists of SiO2. Four types of solid radioactive wastes are located on the storage territory. Uranium production sludges, consisting mainly of gypsum (58–88 wt %), are placed in the Site 1 (depth 3–7 m) and the Site 2 (depth from 3.5–4.5 to 7 m). Uranium production wastes, consisting of 81–89 wt % SiO2, are located within Site 3 (depth 4–7 m). Calcium production sludges are placed in the southern part of Site 2 and on the territory of Site 3 above the uranium wastes. The main compound of these sludges is CaCO3 (60–95 wt %). The zirconium production sludges consist mainly of CaCO3 (53–67 wt %) and CaF2 (23–32 wt %) and are disposed in the northern part of Site 2 above the uranium wastes layer. Uranium is contained throughout the entire volume of the storage wastes and is unevenly distributed. Its average content ranges from 0.006 to 0.498 wt %. depending on the location. Uranium is present in sludges both as part of the main components and in the form of its own mineral phases. The wastes are comparable to poor ores in terms of uranium content, so we can consider these sludges as a technogenic source of this metal.
Keywords:
solid radioactive wastes, near-surface storage facility, uranium production, uranium, phase composition, chemical composition
References:
1. Feng G., Yong J., Liu Q., Chen H., Hu Y., Mao P. Remedial effect and operating status of a decommissioned uranium mill tailings (UMT) repository: a micro-ecological perspective based on bacterial community. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, vol. 340, pp. 117993. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117993.
2. Xie T., Zhu J., Liu X., Hao Y., Wang R., Liang P., Wang Z., Zhang A., Qian T., Zhao D. Fissure channeling caused anomalous uranium concentration in groundwater downstream of a uranium mine tailings impoundment site. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2025, vol. 488, pp. 137492. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137492.
3. Kent R.D., Johnson R.H., Laase A.D., Nyman J.L. Modeling evaluation of the impact of residual source material on remedial time frame at a former uranium mill site. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2024, vol. 261, pp. 104298. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104298.
4. Agapov A.M., Abramov A.A., Dyakov S.V. Problems of nuclear legacy and ways to solve them. Moscow, OJSC «Energopromanalitika» Publ., 2012. Vol. 1, 356 p. (In Russ.)
5. Abramov A.A., Dorofeev A.N., Tyazhkorob Zh.V. Special radioactive waste. Moscow, OOO SAM Polygraphist Publ., 2015. 240 p. (In Russ.)
6. Xie T., Lian B., Chen C., Qian T., Liu X., Shang Z., Li T., Wang R., Wang Z., Zhang A., Zhu J. Leaching behaviour and mechanism of U, 226-Ra and 210-Pb from uranium tailings at different pH conditions. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2023, vol. 270, pp. 107300. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107300.
7. Hao Y., Xie T., Chen C., Chen K., Li T., Lian B., Liang P., Yang S., Wang R., Wang Z., Chen W., Zhang A., Zhu J. Migration behavior of 226-Ra in rock and soil media around a typical uranium tailings reservoir. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2025, vol. 37, pp. 103944. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103944.
8. Xie T., Qian T., Lian B., Chen C., Liang P., Liu X., Li T., Wang T., Chen K., Zhang A., Zhu J. Research on leaching behavior of uranium from a uranium tailing and its adsorption behavior in geotechnical media. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, vol. 353, pp. 120207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120207.
9. Boguslavsky A.E., Gaskova O.L., Shemelina O.V. Uranium migration in groundwater in the area of the sludge storage facility of the Angarsk Electrolysis Chemical Plant. Chemistry for Sustainable Development, 2012, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 515–529. (In Russ.)
10. Ulyanin Yu.A., Boytsov A.V. World uranium industry: status and development prospects. Actual problems of the uranium industry. Collection of works of the X Anniversary International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 25th anniversary of JSC NAC Kazatomprom and the 20th anniversary of LLP Institute of High Technologies. Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, November 24–26, 2022. Almaty, KBTU Publ., 2022. P.t 1, pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)
11. Khan W.S. Treatment of radioactive waste. Recycling and Reusing of Engineering Materials. Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier, 2022. pp. 275–294. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822461-8.00009-7.
12. Li M., Gao F., Zhang X., Lv S., Huang J., Wu X., Fang Q. Recovery of uranium from low-grade tailings by electro-assisted leaching. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 271, pp. 122639. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122639.
13. Golovin S.V., Benkevich V.P., Marchenko S.M., Farushev I.A. Creation and development of JSC Chepetsk Mechanical Plant. Izhevsk, Izhevsk Republican Printing House, 1996. 165 p. (In Russ.)
14. Kondratov A.S. Unique experience of deep disposal of industrial wastewater of ChMZ OJSC. Industrial and environmental safety, 2011, no. 8 (58), pp. 54–55. (In Russ.)
15. Shchelkin K.I., Zadikyan A.A., Morokhov I.D. Soviet atomic science and technology. Moscow, Atomizdat Publ., 1967. 391 p. (In Russ.)
16. Shevchenko V.B., Sudarikov B.N. Uranium technology. Moscow, Atomizdat Publ., 1961. 330 p. (In Russ.)
17. Shtuza M.G., Filippov V.B., Medvedeva M.L., Ershov B.G. Neutralization of industrial waste. Ecology and industry of Russia, 2003, no. 5, pp. 11–14. (In Russ.)
18. Putilina V.S., Galitskaya I.V., Yuganova T.I. Sorption processes during groundwater pollution with heavy metals and radioactive elements. Uranium: analytical review. Novosibirsk, State Public Scientific and Technical Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2014. 127 p. (In Russ.)
19. Savenko V.S., Savenko A.V. Experimental methods for studying low-temperature geochemical processes. Moscow, GEOS Publ., 2009. 303 p. (In Russ.)
20. Shemelina O.V. Patterns of uranium migration in low-radioactive waste storage facilities (on the example of JSC AECC). Cand. Diss. Novosibirsk, 2019. 154 p. (In Russ.)
21. Skripchenko S.Yu., Titova S.М., Nalivaiko K.A., Semenishchev V.S. Uranium behavior during the formation and subsequent storage of solid radioactive wastes from conversion production. ChemChemTech [Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol.], 2024, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 77–86. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.6060/ivkkt.20246705.6925.
22. Yorkshire A.S., Stennett M.C., Walkley B., Provis J.L., Townsend L.T., Haigh L.T., Hyatt N.C., Mottram L.M., Corkhill C.L. Spectroscopic identification of Ca-bearing uranyl silicates formed in C–S–H systems. Scientific Reports, 2023, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 3374. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30024-0.
23. Korovin S.S. Rare and trace elements. Chemistry and technology. Moscow, MISiS Publ. House, 2003. Vol. 2, 461 p. (In Russ.)
24. Doronin N.A. Calcium metallurgy. Moscow, Atomizdat Publ., 1959. 93 p. (In Russ.)
25. Thiery V., Trincal V., Davy C.A. The elusive ettringite under the high-vacuum SEM – a reflection based on natural samples, the use of Monte Carlo modelling of EDS analyses and an extension to the ettringite group minerals. Journal of Microscopy, 2017, vol. 268, pp. 84–93. DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12589.
