Vol. 337 No. 8 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/8/5037
Remediation of soils contaminated with used motor oil by biostimulation method
Relevance. Disruptions in technological processes, along with leaks and spills at industrial facilities, result in soil contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons. When oil enters the soil, it reduces air and water permeability, leading to soil ecosystem degradation, including microorganisms and vegetation. Therefore, the search for effective and safe methods to restore contaminated soils is highly relevant. Aim. To investigate the potential for remediating soil contaminated with used motor oil through biostimulation, using sheep bone biochar and manure as biostimulants, and assess the impact of human intervention. Objects. Soil contaminated with used motor oil at the Ulaanbaatar locomotive depot. Sheep manure provided nutrients, while bone biochar improved air exchange. The experiment included four variants: control, biochar, manure, and their combination. Bioreactors were placed outdoors for 365 days, with one group regularly moistened and stirred, while the other remained untreated. Methods. Total petroleum hydrocarbons were determined by ultrasonic extraction; light and heavy hydrocarbons were analyzed by gas chromatography, and heavy metals were measured using optical emission spectroscopy. Soil characteristics were determined using standard methods in Mongolia. Hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria in the contaminated soil were assessed using a motor oil and gasoline (1:1) mixture as a carbon source. Results and conclusions. A 365-day biostimulation experiment on soil contaminated with used motor oil showed that treating control soil without additives resulted in a 6% increase in biodegradation, highlighting the importance of human intervention. Adding biochar and sheep manure improved biodegradation: biochar increased it from 13.4 to 18.9%, manure from 11.5 to 15.9%, and their combined use raised efficiency from 22.6 to 27.3%. Heavy fractions of used motor oil were biodegraded by indigenous hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria and turned into lighter fractions, especially with biochar (4.7% degradation). The best results were obtained with the combined application of biostimulants.
For citation: Nomintuya A., Buyan Ch. Remediation of soils contaminated with used motor oil by biostimulation method. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2026, vol. 337, no. 8, pp. 227–243. http://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/8/5037
Keywords:
used motor oil, soil contamination, biostimulation, biochar, manure
References:
1. Minnikova T., Kolesnikov S., Revina S., Ruseva A., Gaivoronsky V. Enzymatic assessment of the state of oil-contaminated soils in the south of russia after bioremediation. Toxics, 2023, vol. 11, pp. 355–369. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11040355.
2. Stekolnikova N.V., Bolycheva, S.B. Dynamics of toxicity of soil contaminated with waste motor oil. Modern state and organizational-economic problems of agricultural development. Proceedings of the National Scientific and Practical Conference. Voronezh, November 22, 2023. Voronezh, Voronezh State Agrarian University Publ., 2023. pp. 321–324. (In Russ.)
3. Avaadorj D., Ganga A. Soil science. Ulaanbaatar, Admon Print Publ., 2019. 498 p. (In Mong.)
4. Dobrovolsky G.V. Soil degradation and conservation. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 2002. 654 p. (In Russ.)
5. Uspabaeva A.A., Isaeva A.U. Biorecultivation of oil-contaminated soils of South Kazakhstan. Shymkent, South Kazakhstan University Publ., 2006. 170 p. (In Russ.)
6. Gorovykh O.G., Budko S.V., Saevich K.F. Experience of using the biodestructor Devoroil for cleaning soils of railway sections from oil contaminations. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology, 2022, vol. 2, pp. 81–87. DOI: 10.46646/2521-683X/2022–2-81-87 (In Russ.)
7. Collins Ch. Implementing phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Methods in Biotechnology, Phytoremediation: Methods and Reviews, 2007, vol. 23. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-098-0_8.
8. Abdulsalam S., Adefila S.S., Bugaje I.M., Ibrahim S. Bioremediation of soil contaminated with used motor oil in a closed system. Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2012, vol. 3, no. 12. DOI: 10.4172/2155–6199.1000172
9. Yan L., Sinkko H., Penttinen P., Lindström K. Characterization of successional changes in bacterial community composition during bioremediation of used motor oil-contaminated soil in a boreal climate. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, vol. 542, pp. 817–825. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.144.
10. Boonchan S., Britz M., Stanley G. Degradation of high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by defined fungi–bacteria cocultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1007–1019. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.3.1007–1019.2000.
11. Shirchin B., Tuya M., Hongorzul B., Khulan B. Fundamentals of petroleum chemistry and technology. Ulaanbaatar, Soyombo Printing Publ., 2013. 530 p. (In Mong.)
12. Alyushina A.I. Improving methods for reclamation of soils contaminated with oil products Youth Program of the 26th International Specialized Exhibition and Forum. Moscow, December 6–9, 2022. Moscow, Association of Developers, Manufacturers and Suppliers of Personal Protective Equipment Publ., 2023. pp. 2–5. (In Russ.)
13. Bagmid Ts., Altantsetseg Ts., Tsevenjav J., Naranchimeg P. Ecology of the oil industry. Ulaanbaatar, General Printing Publ., 2009. 530 p. (In Mong.)
14. SS 57079–2016 Biotechnology. Classification of biotechnology products. Moscow, Standardinform Publ., 2016. 23 p. (In Russ.)
15. Saeed M., Ilyas N., Jayachandran K., Gaffar S., Arshad M., Ahmad M., Bibi F., Jeddi K., Hessini K. Biostimulation potential of biochar for remediating the crude oil-contaminated soil and plant growth. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2021, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2667–2676. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.044.
16. Buyan Ch., Sodtsetseg E. Possibility of biostimulation for crude oil-contaminated soil from Tamsagbulag, Mongolia. Chemistry, processing and ecological problems of combustible minerals. Proceedings of the scientific conference. Ulaanbaatar, University of Science and Technology and Association of Chemistry, 2015. No. 03, pp. 50–55. (In Mong.)
17. Adams G.O., Fufeyin P.T., Okoro S.E., Ehinomen I. Bioremediation, biostimulation, and bioaugmentation: a review. International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2015, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–39. DOI: 10.12691/ijebb-3-1-5.
18. Udume O.A., Abu G.O., Stanley H.O., Vincent-Akpu I.F., Momoh Y., Eze M.O. Biostimulation of petroleum-contaminated soil using organic and inorganic amendments. Plants, 2023, vol. 12, Article 431. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030431.
19. Yadav S. Bioremediation of crude oil contaminated soils using cow dung as bio-enhancement agent: a review. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1176–1182. DOI: 10.21276/ijpbs.2019.9.3.145.21
20. Obiakalaije U.M., Makinde O.A., Amakoromo E.R. Bioremediation of crude oil polluted soil using animal waste. International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2015, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 79–85. DOI: 10.12691/ijebb-3-3-2
21. Tremblay J., Yergeau E., Fortin N., Cobanli S., Elias M., King T.L., Lee K., Greer C.W. Chemical dispersants enhance the activity of oil- and gas condensate-degrading marine bacteria. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 2793–2808. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.129.
22. Xu X., Liu W., Tian S., Wang W., Qi Q., Jiang P., Gao X., Li F., Li H., Yu H. Petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria for the remediation of oil pollution under aerobic conditions: a perspective analysis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, vol. 9, Article 2885. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02885.
23. Munkhbat B. Biochar. Agriculture and the environment. Ulaanbaatar, Biochar Research Center of the Agricultural University Publ., 2018. 102 p. (In Mong.)
24. Alexandrov D.V., Nafikova E.V., Shaniyazova A.F. The effectiveness of using biochar and mycorrhiza in the restoration of oil-contaminated soils. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 2024, vol. 16, no. 2. (In Russ.) Available at: https://esj.today/PDF/07NZVN224.pdf (accessed 25 February 2025).
25. Minnikova T.V., Kolesnikov S.I., Minin N.S. Integral phytotoxicity of oil-contaminated chernozem after remediation with biochar and bacterial preparation. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 2024, vol. 335, no. 5, pp. 95–106. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2024/5/4337
26. Fang X., Zhang M., Zheng P., Wang H., Wang K., Lv J., Shi F. Biochar-bacteria-plant combined potential for remediation of oil-contaminated soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2024, vol. 15, Article 1343366. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1343366.
27. Ali M., Jamal A., Farooq U., He H., Guo H., Huang Z., Aziz S. Enhanced bioremediation of diesel range hydrocarbons in soil using biochar made from organic wastes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020, vol. 192. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-08540-7.
28. Yousaf U., Khan A.H.A., Farooqi A., Muhammad Y.S., Barros R., Tamayo-Ramos J.A., Iqbal M., Yousaf S. Interactive effect of biochar and compost with Poaceae and Fabaceae plants on remediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons in crude oil contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 2021, vol. 286. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131782.
29. Minnikova T., Kolesnikov S., Minin N., Gorovtsov A., Vasilchenko N., Chistyakov V. The influence of remediation with Bacillus and Paenibacillus strains and biochar on the biological activity of petroleum-hydrocarbon-contaminated Haplic Chernozem. Agriculture, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, Article 719. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13030719.
30. Wyszkowska J., Borowik A., Zaborowska M., Kucharski J. Biochar, Halloysite, and Alginite improve the quality of soil contaminated with petroleum products. Agriculture, 2023, vol. 13, no. 9, Article 1669. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13091669. (In Russ.)
31. Ruseva A., Minnikova T., Kolesnikov S., Revina S., Trushkov A. Ecological state of Haplic Chernozem after pollution by oil at different levels and remediation by biochar. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, Article 13375. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.3390/su151813375.
32. MNS 5850:2019. Soil quality. Soil pollutants permissible value. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolian agency for standard and metrology, 2019. 10 с. (In Mong.)
33. Baatar R. Methods for determining soil chemistry, agrochemistry, and water-physical properties. Ulaanbaatar, Jinst Khargana Publ., 2003. 168 p. (In Mong.)
34. MNS 2143:2000. Soils. Laboratory methods for determination of physical characteristics. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolian agency for standard and metrology, 2000. 22 p. (In Mong.)
35. MNS 3675:1984. Soils. Methods of laboratory determination of organic composition. Ulaanbaatar, State committee for prices and standards, 1984. 10 p. (In Mong.)
36. Ninjbadgar B., Buyan Ch. Lab-scale bioremediation experiment of crude oil-contaminated soil. Mongolian Soil Science, 2019, vol. 4, pp. 114–126. (In Mong.)
37. Myazin V.A., Ivanova L.A., Chaporgina A.A., Fokina N.V., Korneikova M.V., Evdokimova G.A It's time to heal the arctic. Biological methods for cleaning and restoring oil-contaminated areas. Ed. by E.A. Borovichev. Apatity, FRC KSC RAS Publ., 2023. 94 p. (In Russ.)
38. Ruberto L., Dias R., Balbo A., Vazquez S., Hernandez E., Mac Cormack W. Influence of nutrients addition and bioaugmentation on the hydrocarbon biodegradation of a chronically contaminated Antarctic soil. Journal of applied microbiology, 2009, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1101–1110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04073.x.
39. Molina-Barahona L., Rodríguez-Vázquez R., Hernández-Velasco M., Vega-Jarquín C., Zapata-Pérez O., Mendoza-Cantú A., Albores A. Diesel removal from contaminated soils by biostimulation and supplementation with crop residues. Applied Soil Ecology, 2004, vol. 27, pp. 165–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.04.002
40. Chuluun B., Shah S.H., Rhee J.S. Bio-augmented phytoremediation: a strategy for reclamation of diesel oil-contaminated soils. International journal of agriculture & biology, 2014, vol. 16, pp. 624–628.
41. Mosuna Y.V. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with oil and petroleum products in the conditions of the Western Caucasus. Cand. Diss. Abstract. Krasnodar, 2009. 22 p. (In Russ.)
42. Polyanskova E.A. Ecological assessment of gray forest and chernozem soils with varying degrees of oil contamination. Cand. Diss. Abstract. Penza, 2011. 23 p. (In Russ.)
43. Rudenko E.Yu. Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soils with organic components of food (brewing) industry waste. Cand. Diss. Samara, 2015. 352 p. (In Russ.)
44. Okonokhua B.O., Ikhajiagbe B., Anoliefo G., Emede T. The effects of spent engine oil on soil properties and growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 2010, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 147–152. DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v11i3.55162.
45. Borah D., Yadav R.N.S. Biodegradation of petroleum oil by a novel bacillus cereus strain DRDU1 from an automobile engine. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2014, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1287–1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.02.005.
46. Kapur M.A., Yuvarani M., Shiyamala G., Sudha S.S., Janaki S., Prasanna J., Basha A.K. The role of microbes in environmental bioremediation: novel approaches for pollution control. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 2024, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 377–382. DOI: 10.53555/jaz.v45i2.3867
47. Sakson V.M., Kuznetsov S.A., Bojkova I.V. Bacterial strain Bacillus cereus B 3b for oxidation of petroleum hydrocarbons and derivatives. Patent RF, no. 2157843, 2000. (In Russ.)
48. Bertovíc, B., Šabíc Runjavec, M., Todorovíc, N., Zgrebec, I., Vukovíc Domanovac M. Biotechnological potential of oil-tolerant strains for possible use in bioremediation. Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, 563. DOI: 10.3390/su16020563
49. Chikwe T.N., Ogbole S.N. Remediation of simulated oil contaminated sites using shells of clams and oyster – total petroleum hydrocarbons of simulated oil contaminated sites, before and after remediation. Nigerian Journal of Chemical Research, 2019, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. xx–xx.
50. Williams J. Bioremediation of modelled petroleum-contaminated soils of the Niger Delta and the impact of zeolite augmentation. Wolverhampton, University of Wolverhampton, 2014. 131 p. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/322349 (accessed 25 February 2025).
51. Vasilyeva G.K., Strizhakova E.R., Bocharnikova E.A., Semenyuk N.N., Yatsenko V.S., Slyusarevsky A.V., Baryshnikova E.A. Oil and petroleum products as soil pollutants: technology for combined physical and biological remediation of contaminated soils. Russian Chemical Journal, 2013, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 79–104.
52. Juárez-Cisneros G., Saucedo-Martínez B.C., Sánchez-Yáñez J.M. Bioelimination of Phytotoxic hydrocarbons by biostimulation and phytoremediation of soil polluted by waste motor oil. Plants, 2023, vol. 12, no. 1053. DOI: 10.3390/plants12051053/
53. Dawud K.I., Umer M.I. Bioremediation of heavily contaminated soil in washeindustrial area using bio-composting technique with sheep and chicken manure in Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Journal of University of Duhok, 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 322–331.
54. Ahmed A.B., Nadia A.A., Kuther H.M. Ex situ bioremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil by use of actinomycetes consortia for process bioaugmentation. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 24–30.
55. Tumanov A. Fertilizers in the garden and vegetable patch. Ed. by M. Kovalenko. Moscow, Your 6 Sotkas Publ., 2016. 81 p. (In Russ.)
56. Omotosho J., Momoh O.L.Y., Ikebude C.F. Application of bone char in bioremediation of crude oil polluted soil: optimization and kinetic analysis. Journal of Research Information in Civil Engineering, 2018, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2361–2374.
57. Burachevskaya M.V., Minkina T.M., Bauer T.V., Lobzenko I.P., Severina V.I. Influence of biochar from agricultural waste on soil pH changes during heavy metal absorption. Actual Biotechnologies, 2021, no. 1, pp. 208–210. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26907/2542-064X.2021.2.221-237.
58. Galieva G.Sh., Kuryntseva P.A., Galitskaya P.Yu., Tagirov M.Sh., Selivanovskaya S.Yu. Influence of chicken manure biochar on microorganisms and plants. Kazan University Proceedings. Series: Natural Sciences, 2021, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 221–237. DOI: 10.26907/2542-064X.2021.2.221-237.
59. Ponomareva A.L. Increasing the efficiency of oil-containing wastewater treatment using oil-oxidizing microorganisms. Cand. Diss. Vladivostok, 2018. 136 p. (In Russ.)
60. Drugov Yu.S., Rodin A.A. Environmental analyses in oil and petroleum product spills: a practical guide. Moscow, BINOM. Laboratory of Knowledge Publ., 2007. 270 p. (In Russ.)
61. Ezhelev Z.S. Properties and regimes of reclaimed soils after oil spills in the usinsk district of the Republic of Komi. Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2015. 142 p. (In Russ.)
62. Zaborskaya O.Yu., Zaborskaya A.Yu., Kramm E.A. Soil microflora as an agent of biodegradation of oil pollutants. International research journal, 2017, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 15–17. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2017.66.014
