Vol. 337 No. 1 (2026)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2026/1/4950
Development of technology for buılding-up the flow rate of underground gas storage wells
Relevance. The need to understand the mechanisms of reducing effective gas permeability, gas and condensate flow rates due to the formation of a liquid hydrocarbon phase and accumulation of liquid around underground gas storage wells, as well as the entire range of gas condensate wells at bottomhole pressure below the liquid dew point. Aim. To develop a technology for restoring the parameters of gas injection and extraction from underground gas storage wells by cleaning the bottomhole zone of wells from accumulated liquid. Methods. Analytical studies, laboratory analyzes of well fluid samples, field tests, statistical methods. Results and conclusions. It is shown that since underground gas storage facilities are created on depleted gas condensate deposits, their wells have most of the operational characteristics of gas condensate wells in general. Along with this, the article also examines and reflects a number of features characteristic of a underground gas storage well. The authors have proposed a technology for using an inexpensive solvent such as methanol to increase the production rate of wells by cleaning the bottom-hole zone of the well. The criteria for selecting candidate gas condensate wells for applying the technology are indicated. The authors give the recommendations on parametric requirements and methanol consumption rates for wells subject to selection for the application of technology to increase production by cleaning the bottom-hole zone of gas wells from liquid plugs. It was established that in underground gas storage wells with operating pressure in the range of 7.0–16.0 MPa, ideal conditions are created for retrograde settling of liquid. The paper provides the ınformation on the progress of field tests, the results obtained and their analysis. By applying the technology in field conditions, the result obtained was to double the injectivity of a underground gas storage well during gas injection. It is shown that if before the impact the share of the experimental well in the total injection volume was 0.51–0.5.6%, then after the impact this figure changes in the range of 0.84–1.72%, that is, the increase was from 1.5 to 3 once. In this regard, a conclusion was also made about an increase in the well flow rate during the gas withdrawal season.
Keywords:
underground gas storage, gas-condensate well, production, methanol, bottomhole pressure
References:
1. Iwaszczuk N., Prytula M., Prytula N., Pyanylo Y., Iwaszczuk A. Modeling of gas flows in underground gas storage facilities. Energies, 2022, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 7216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197216
2. Istomin V.A., Izyumchenko D.V., Krapivin V.B., Troynikova A.A., Kvon V.G., Sergeeva D.V. Features of methanol application to prevent hydrate formation in wells of Chayandinskoye OGCF. OilGasChemistry, 2022, no. 1–2, pp. 60–67. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24412/2310-8266-2022-1-2-60-67
3. Omarova G.M., Gabdullin Zh.Kh., Mukhambetkaliev D.K., Dzhusupkalieva R.I. Gas condensate deposits in gas wells. Young scientist, 2023, no. 16 (463), pp. 36–39. (In Russ.) DOI: https://moluch.ru/archive/463/101815/
4. Baghirov Sh.A. Development of technology for production recovery of gas-condensate wells. Herald of the Azerbaijan Engineering Academy, 2022, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 62–68. DOI: 10.52171/2076-0515_2022_14_04_62_68
5. Plaat H. Underground gas storage: why and how. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2009, vol. 313, no. 1, pp. 25–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/sp313.4
6. Fibbi G., Del Soldato M., Fanti R. Review of the monitoring applications involved in the underground storage of natural gas and CO2. Energies, 2023, vol. 16, no. 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010012
7. Asgar A., Dianatirad M., Ranjbaran M., Sadeghi A.R., Rahimpour M.R. Methanol treatment in gas condensate reservoirs a modeling and experimental study. Chem. Eng. Res. Des, 2014, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 876–890. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.08.015
8. Igwe Uche, Khishvand Mahdi, Piri Mohammad. Retrograde condensation in natural porous media: An in situ experimental investigation. Physics of Fluids, 2022, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 013102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0073801
9. Tanbhir A.A., Monir M.U., Hossain M.J. Underground natural gas storage. Advances in Natural Gas: Formation, Processing, and Applications. Natural Gas Transportation and Storage, 2024, vol. 6, pp. 125–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-19225-8.00005-6
10. Sayed M.A., Al-Muntasheri G.A., Mitigation of the effects of condensate banking: a critical review. SPE Production & Operations Journal, 2015, SPE–168153–PA. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168153-PA.
11. Włodek T. The retrograde condensation problem in natural gas pipeline transportation system. AGH Drilling. Gas, 2017, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 701–712. DOI: 10.7494/drill.2017.34.3.701
12. Gangxiong Zhang, Bin Li, Dewen Zheng, Guosheng Ding, Huan Wei, Pinshu Qian, Chun Li. Challenges to and proposals for underground gas storage (UGS) business in China. Natural Gas Industry B, 2017, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 231–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2017.07.025.
13. Nikolaos D., Anna P., Omid S., Sudhagar P., John M., Andresenb A. Review of analogue case studies relevant to large-scale underground hydrogen storage. Energy Reports, 2024, vol. 11, pp. 2374–2400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.02.002.
14. Jin Lai, Yang Su, Lu Xiao, Fei Zhao, Tianyu Bai, Yuhang Li, Hongbin Li, Yuyue Huang, Guiwen Wang, Ziqiang Qin. Application of geophysical well logs in solving geological issues: past, present and future prospect. Geoscience Frontiers, 2024, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 101779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101779.
15. Volovetskyi V., Romanyshyn Y., Altukhov S., Bugai A., Doroshenko Y., Shchyrba O. Developing an electronic archive of geophysical survey results from underground gas storage wells. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 2024 vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 14–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4826
16. Wennberg O.P., Casini G., Jonoud S., Peacock D.C. The characteristics of open fractures in carbonate reservoirs and their impact on fluid flow: a discussion. Petroleum Geoscience, 2016. vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 91–10.
17. Ruban G.N. Geological and technological control of underground gas storage facilities. Moscow, Russian State University of Oil and Gas (NRU) named after I.M. Gubkin Publ., 2016. 207 p. (In Russ.)
18. Grishin D.V. Integrated technology for increasing the productivity of underground gas storage wells in conditions of reservoir destruction. Cand. Diss. Ufa. 2019. 153 p.
19. Iskandarov E.X., Baghirov S.A. Analytıcal and wave-depressıon methods of elımınatıon of the onset of hydratıon ın subsea gas pıpelınes. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences, 2022, no. 4, pp. 96–108.
20. Iskandarov E.X. Improving the efficiency of the functioning of gas pipelines, taking into account the structural features of gas flows. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences, 2021, vol. 447, no. 1, pp. 34–39.
21. Iskandarov E.Kh., Baghirov A.N., Shikhiyeva L.M. Method for assessing the hydrate formation from a mixture of natural gas flows of varying degrees of moisture content. Nafta-Gaz, 2024, no. 1, pp. 39–44. DOI: 10.18668/NG.2024.01.05
